22nd
January
2007
US politics is getting more interesting, with both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton outing themselves as Democratic contenders for the Presidency in 2008. At this stage I’d say I like the look of Obama (who has a cool name Barack Hussein Obama that rhymes with the US’s nemeses Iraq, Hussein (as in Saddam), and Osama (as in Bin Laden). But Hillary will be hard to beat. Will be very enthralling to watch. My personal favourite would be an Al Gore ticket with Obama as his running mate, grooming him for another run at the Presidency when he’s a bit older, but we’ll have to say if Gore decides to take time out from saving the environment to have another go at the top job.
Categories : Politics |
22nd
January
2007
Now I’m probably not legitimately qualified to be critical of the Left Behind series of religious novels, since I haven’t read a single page. I’ve heard they can be semi-entertaining in a comic book kind of way, yet all I hear of their theology and it’s ramifications is quite disturbing. But someone is is qualified to comment is the Slacktivist, a well educated American Christian blogger and writer, who is slowly working his way through the first book on his blog, in addition to his other insightful and sensible comments on US politics and other subjects. Following his blog is like getting the Left Behind novel in serialised form - I’m able to follow the story while at the same time Slacktivist mercilessly demolishes it - his criticisms are not just theological, but also ethical, logical, and above all literary. He has a large following and gets plenty of comments, the majority of which agree with him, so I’m not sure how the Left Behind fans would find his site. For me, I’ve found it very entertaining (quite humorous at times), thought-provoking and illuminating, and will continue to keep a regular eye on it.
On a related issue, the book I’m currently reading by Ben Witherington III (who also has an interesting blog) called The Problem with Evangelical Theology systematically debunks the theology behind Left Behind. His arguments are relatively easy to follow and make a lot of sense, despite the depth he goes into in his detailed analysis of scripture. A little denser (and perhaps more unsettling) is when he takes on some more theological heavyweights in his criticisms of the theology of Calvin, Luther, and Augustine. Once again his arguments are logical and seem to make sense, but I feel out of my depth in making any judgement as to who’s right about these things. As a layperson dipping fingers into the deep well of theology, it’s important to remain humble and not just blindly accept whatever I read. However much I wish otherwise, I just am not well enough educated or qualified to make these sort of judgements (and will probably never be). All I can do is say to myself what feels right and logical and scriptural and say what system seems best to me, whilst acknowledging that I don’t know for sure. For example Witherington’s views on perseverance and apostasy are quite challenging and confronting and his exegetical reasoning seems to make sense - but I am not in a position to confidently conclude whether I believe him or not. The sensible reaction for me is to ask myself not “Is he right or wrong” but “what if he is right? what ramifications does that have for the way in which I conduct my life?” and thinking in that way is both sobering and worthwhile. Some might say it’s dangerous ground for a layperson to go exploring in matters of theology, but I think as long as I maintain a healthy level of “epistemological humility” and realisation of my own limitations, it can be a valuable enterprise.
Categories : Blogs, Religion, books |
